Improving nursing home care is vital. Missing or delayed medical care for nursing home residents has been proven to lead to poor outcomes, and we need to find a better way to serve this vulnerable population. Nursing homes need telemedicine now more than ever. More than 10% of patients admitted to a skilled nursing facility for post-acute care never see a doctor or advanced practice nurse during their stay. Telemedicine enables all nursing homes to provide in-house medical care. Telehealth augments on-site clinical staff for continuous care. Telemedicine is even scalable for small or rural facilities that don’t have the bandwidth to employ onsite clinical staff. The median nursing home stay for post-acute patients who never see a physician is 11 days. Telemedicine eliminates this issue, saving lives. Patients who don’t see a doctor during their stay are more vulnerable to consequences. Post-acute nursing home patients who don’t see a physician or advanced practice nurse are two times more likely to be readmitted to the hospital or die within 30 days of their visit. Without a doctor visit, 28% of patients are rehospitalized and 14% pass within 30 days. A checkup with a doctor reduces those numbers to 14% and 7%, respectively. Not only does not see a doctor harm residents but also delayed medical care can lead to equally devastating consequences. Early detection is the key in many cases. Many health problems can be treated in the nursing home if detected early. This goes for acute conditions such as severe dehydration, urinary tract infections, and pneumonia, as well as congestive heart failure, asthma, uncontrolled diabetes, and COPD. Advanced practice nurses help facilities manage health issues by recognizing signs of infection and improving the recognition skills of other staff members. Vital sign monitoring is an essential part of nursing homesManually taking vital signs usually takes about 4 minutes and documenting those readings can take an additional 12. In addition to being time-consuming, manual vital sign monitoring can lead to errors. Multiplication errors, delayed documentation, illegible handwriting, and data entry errors all pose a threat to patient health. Automated monitors through telehealth cut the whole process down to less than a minute and eliminate the risk of human error. Readings are more consistent over time and are automatically entered into the electronic medical records, and staff is notified quickly when readings are outside of the prescribed parameters. In addition, wireless monitors allow nurses to collect and document readings in just two minutes. This gives nursing staff more time to focus on patients, and they receive more immediate interventions, reducing readmissions and improving overall patient health. Telemedicine provides nursing home residents with bedside access to a team of specialists and behavioural health services. They use state-of-the-art technologies to improve patient outcomes. Not only do they provide vital sign monitoring, but they also offer a dedicated clinician assigned to every facility, 24/7 care, and an on-site nurse practitioner to work with their team of trained professionals. Their care means conditions can be treated early, preventing rehospitalization and improving outcomes. Learn more on how telemedicine is changing the game for patient care in the infographic below: Source link The post How Telemedicine Allows Nursing Homes to Run Like Startups first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law.
0 Comments
Clayton family to file wrongful death lawsuit against city of Oxford | Crime & Law Enforcement7/31/2021 By the end of last year’s U.S. population, the Census Bureau did not have data on nearly one-fifth of U.S. occupied college dormitories, nursing homes, and prisons, so statistical agencies were institutionalized for collection. I had to make an 11 hour phone call. Provide information or use last resort statistical techniques to fill the gap. 43,000 of the 227,000 occupied dormitories, prisons, barracks, homeless shelters, group homes and nursing homes count until December, according to new documents and slide presentations recently released by the Census Office in the Information Disclosure Law proceedings. I wasn’t able to do it. According to the Republican constituency change advocacy group. The document suggests a range of challenges faced by the Bureau in conducting large-scale counts in the midst of a pandemic. This effort was made even more difficult by wildfires, hurricanes, and attempts by the Trump administration to interfere with the census. Pandemics have forced universities to close dormitories and send students home, and nursing homes and other facilities protect vulnerable residents from the virus. Bureau officials are confident that they have filled the gap using statistical methods that they consider reliable, but they admit that the challenge was formidable. Census official Barbara Lo Presti recently said that data collected from the group’s quarters accounts for most of the irregularities encountered by statistical agencies, but data processing “cannot be corrected by data collection.” Does not indicate a serious error. “ “Processing anomalies are not errors, but they can be errors if not evaluated and corrected,” LoPresti told a virtual conference of external experts assessing the quality of 2020 census data. rice field. “Therefore, our quality (checking) process was working.” However, correcting the irregularity forced the Census Bureau to postpone the release of numbers used to divide parliamentary seats between states in a process called allocation. It also delayed the release of constituency change data used to redraw parliament and legislative districts by five months. Although people living in group districts make up a small proportion of the total population (less than 3% of the 331 million people living in the United States), inaccurate information is provided to the populous areas and military of university towns and prisons. Base that can have a big impact. As a result, parliamentary representatives and the amount of federal funding they are eligible to receive may be reduced. “In some regions, individual groups can have huge quarters,” Connie Citro, a senior scholar at the National Statistics Committee, said in a virtual meeting of outside experts. The Republican advocacy group, the Fair Lines America Foundation, has appealed for information about how the Census Bureau’s quarterly counts were done. The allocation number will be announced by the Census Bureau in April, and the subdivision number used to depict Congress and the legislative district will be released next month. Dormitories, elderly housings, and prisons while the Census Bureau is calculating numbers. This method has been used for some time to fill in the missing information about individual households. “If the Census Bureau is allowed to make this kind of methodology change and implementation in a closed room … Election turmoil depends on the number of potentially flawed states in repartitioning. It could be due to being there, “Fairlines said in a court document. In addition to the 43,000 group quarter addresses that were lacking data last December, another 3,500 addresses stated that the number of people was zero or too high, suggesting duplication. There was no count. Statisticians have removed duplicates such as college students counted in both dormitories and parents’ homes, the document said. In the absence of information about dormitories, nursing homes, and prison residents, Census Bureau statisticians apply information they already know about the facility from either previous investigations, previous contacts, or administrative records. The count has been reached. After substitution and deduplication, the revised numbers seemed to artificially inflate the group quarter count by 444,000 people. Almost 8.6 million people lived in place of the 8.1 million people expected to live in the group district. Group quarters of the revised data were significantly higher in California, New York, Florida, and Washington, the document and slide presentations show. The Census Bureau said in a statement that the numbers in the document were not final numbers and that the 444,000 differences were addressed in a later calculation of the numbers. Statistical agencies did not state what the final numbers were or provide details on how the differences were handled. “The Census Bureau has made some improvements to its methodology since the day these slides were created,” the statement said. ——-- Follow Mike Schneider on Twitter. ttps: //twitter.com/MikeSchneiderAP Census: One in five dorms, prison had no data at the end of US counts | Nationwide Source link Census: One in five dorms, prison had no data at the end of US counts | Nationwide The post Census: One in five dorms, prison had no data at the end of US counts | Nationwide first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law. Clayton family to file wrongful death lawsuit against city of Oxford | Crime & Law Enforcement7/31/2021 A Republican advocacy group on Wednesday withdrew its request for a court order seeking the immediate release of Census Bureau records after the agency’s chief scientist warned their disclosure could push back the already delayed release of redistricting data used for drawing congressional and legislative districts. Fair Lines America Foundation withdrew its request for a preliminary injunction in a public records lawsuit against the statistical agency. Earlier this week, Census Bureau Chief Scientist John Abowd had said in a court declaration that the records’ disclosure could cause an additional delay of up to six months in the redistricting data’s release. The redistricting data is set to be made public by Aug. 16 following a five-month delay from its original deadline due to the pandemic. The delay sent states scrambling to revise redistricting deadlines, and two states, Ohio and Alabama, sued the Census Bureau in an unsuccessful effort to get it to release the data before August. Fair Lines sued the Census Bureau in a public records lawsuit for information about how the census count was conducted on people living in dormitories, prisons, nursing homes and group homes. Those facilities are called “group quarters” by the bureau. Fair Lines says it’s concerned about the accuracy of the group quarters count and wants to make sure anomalies didn’t affect the state population figures used for divvying up congressional seats among the states. The withdrawal is only being made on the preliminary injunction motion, not the public records lawsuit. Group facilities were among the most difficult places to count people during the 2020 census because the pandemic forced colleges to shutter dorms and send students home. Also, nursing homes and other facilities restricted access in an effort to protect vulnerable residents from the virus. Abowd said that if the Census Bureau is required to release additional records as part of the Fair Lines lawsuit it will need as much as six months to recalibrate a new statistical tool meant to protect people’s privacy so that they can’t be identified through the data. The privacy method known as “differential privacy” adds calibrated error to the data, most noticeably at small geographic levels such as neighborhood blocks, in order to prevent people being identified by high-powered computers through matches with third-party data such as voting records or credit card data. In a statement, Fair Lines called Abowd’s declaration “laughably self-serving.” “This Census Bureau has been plagued with embarrassing problems for the last many months, in large part due to Abowd’s push to apply ‘differential privacy’ over the objections of many outside and inside the Bureau,” the statement said. “All we are seeking is transparency in how the count was determined – which reveals no privacy issues whatsoever.” Because of the privacy method, data at the neighborhood block-level may look “fuzzy,” with weird situations such as blocks showing children living with no adults or the number of people not matching the number of housing units in a block, acting Census Bureau director Ron Jarmin said Wednesday in a blog post. Jarmin said that blocks should be added together to produce accurate results. “Though unusual, situations like these in the data help confirm that confidentiality is being protected,” Jarmin said. ___ Follow Mike Schneider on Twitter at https://twitter.com/MikeSchneiderAP The post Facing Census Delay, Group Withdraws Request for Records – NBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law. Stay ahead of the curveIn the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS Source link The post Sauk-Suiattle Tribe Says Seattle’s Dam Illegally Blocks Fish first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law. Deborah Palmer (“Plaintiff”), as the surviving spouse of Vance Palmer (“Mr. Palmer”), brought multiple claims against defendants Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. (“Hospital”) and neurosurgeon Bikash Bose, M.D. (“Dr. Bose”)1. Plaintiff alleged Dr. Bose negligently performed an unnecessary surgery on Mr. Palmer’s brain2. Mr. Palmer suffered a stroke during the surgery and passed away approximately one year later due to stroke complications3. Plaintiff also alleged that the Hospital was aware of Dr. Bose’s reputation for performing negligent surgeries4. At the time of Mr. Palmer’s surgery, Dr. Bose had been named in 31 medical malpractice lawsuits and the Hospital had been named as a co-defendant in 15 of the 31 lawsuits. Plaintiff alleged that, despite the considerable number of malpractice lawsuits5, the Hospital failed to take action to limit Dr. Bose’s ability to practice at the Hospital6. As part of the lawsuit, Plaintiff sought documents from the Hospital and Dr. Bose. Plaintiff specifically sought information about any Hospital peer review meetings held concerning Dr. Bose, including the meeting dates, creation of, membership of, and results of any such peer review meetings7. The Hospital did not produce documents in response to the Plaintiff’s request and cited the protections of Delaware’s peer review statute8. After reviewing Delaware peer review precedent in a variety of contexts, the Delaware Superior Court held that the scope of peer review discovery depends on: (1) the peer committee being queried; and (2) the claim upon which discovery is sought9. Here, the court differentiated between quality assurance committees and credentialing committees10. The court stated quality assurance committee discussions represent the core of what a peer review privilege must protect11. For example, the court stated quality assurance committees discuss cases of morbidity, mortality, and other sentinel events12. On the other hand, the court found that a credentialing committee’s role is more akin to a personnel decision than examining what occurred during surgery13. Therefore, the court determined that credentialing a practitioner is less likely to implicate the core values expressed in the peer review statute and was not subject to protection under the Delaware peer review statute14. The court held that to the extent the Hospital conducted peer review of Mr. Palmer’s surgery, such consideration was not subject to discovery because this review encompassed the essence of the peer review privilege15. However, to the extent Plaintiff sought information concerning the credentialing of Dr. Bose16, the court allowed discovery to potentially support Plaintiff’s arguments that the Hospital acted in bad faith when it continued to recredential Dr. Bose. Ultimately, discovery concerning Dr. Bose’s credentialing at the Hospital was allowed regarding: (1) the dates and times of any Credentials Committee meetings where Dr. Bose’s credentials were considered; (2) identification and production of any documents submitted to the Credentials Committee for consideration, provided the documents were not produced exclusively for use by the Credentials Committee; and (3) any documents produced by the Credentials Committee that were shared with a different person, group, or entity concerning Dr. Bose’s credentialing at the Hospital17. Take AwayThe Delaware Superior Court considered credentialing activities to be more akin to a personnel decision than a protected discussion of quality concerns. The court looked to the “core values” expressed in Delaware’s peer review statute to determine what is, and what is not, protected peer review. This case demonstrates that the scope of the peer review privilege is not purely defined by the Delaware peer review privilege statute, but is also refined by case law. FOOTNOTES1 Palmer v. Christiana Care Health Servs., Inc., C.A. No. N19C-01-294 CEB, 2021 WL 673462 *1 (Del. Super. Ct. Feb. 22, 2021). 2 Id 3 Id 4 Id 5 Id 6 Id 7 Id 8 Id. See 24 Del. C. § 1768 9 Id. at *5. 10 Id. at *4. 11 Id. 12 Id. 13 Id. 14 Id. at *5. 15 Id. 16 Id. 17 Id.
Source link The post Delaware Superior Court Consider Peer Review Statute in Case first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law. Slip and fall, or trip and fall accidents, a type of premises liability case, can be devastating, both physically and financially. If you’ve recently been involved in a slip and fall accident and you’re thinking of filing a personal injury claim, you’re probably wondering what you’ll have to do to win. Slip and fall cases are challenging because you have to prove three things, all of which are critical. You have to prove that your accident was due to someone else’s negligence, you have to prove that it directly caused your injuries, and you have to prove that your slip and fall accident injuries have direct financial costs. There are several ways a slip and fall accident can occur. Whether it’s from a lack of signage warning about a wet floor or a failure to maintain safe sidewalks, the number of things that can cause a slip and fall accident is almost infinite. When a property owner does fail to protect you from a slip and fall injury, it may still be difficult for you to prove your case. In the article below, we will discuss why it can be difficult to win your slip and fall case. What Percentage of Slip and Fall Cases Go To Trial?The vast majority of slip and fall cases will settle out of court because defendants understand that it is typically less expensive and much less time-consuming than taking the case to trial. But even though most slip and fall cases will settle out of court, each case is unique, and the outcome will depend on the unique circumstances surrounding your accident. Some cases settle long before a jury trial takes place, while others can settle days or even hours before a trial is set to take place. Many times, whether or not your case goes to trial is determined by the willingness of the insurance company to offer a fair settlement to the victim of a slip and fall accident. How Long Do Slip and Fall Cases Take To Settle?The time it takes to settle your slip and fall case can be anywhere from a few months to a few years. It all depends on the exact circumstances that are involved. Victims of slip and fall accidents due to someone else’s negligence have a little control over how long it takes your case to settle. You can do things to speed up the process, but you always want to be sure you take enough time to be sure you get a fair settlement. How Do You Prove Negligence In A Slip and Fall Case?Every property owner has a responsibility to maintain their property and remedy any hazards as soon as possible to avoid all serious injuries. Although it may seem straightforward, it can be quite difficult to prove that the property owner was negligent. Property owners are likely to argue that you had some or all of the fault in your accident and that you are responsible for your injuries. To prove that the property owner is responsible for your injuries, you must prove that they should have known about the dangerous condition, that they didn’t fix it, or the owners carelessness caused the dangerous condition. How Is Slip and Fall Pain and Suffering CalculatedThere are two ways to calculate pain and suffering damages. The first way is called the multiplier method. With the multiplier method, you use a number between 1.5 and 5, depending on your injuries’ severity. Your personal injury law firm will help you come up with this number. The idea behind the multiplier method is that your pain and suffering is worth anywhere between 1.5 and 5 times the actual cost of repairing the injury. Typically insurance companies will always come in a little lower than your attorney will when calculating pain and suffering damages. Your personal injury lawyer will help you negotiate your pain and suffering damages, so you get what you deserve. There is also the per diem method. Per diem means “by the day” in Latin. As the name implies, you will be paid a specific dollar amount each day from the time the accident occurred until you reach maximum medical improvement. Why It’s Hard To Win a Slip and Fall CaseNo matter what type of personal injury case you may have, it will always rely on your ability to prove negligence. In a slip and fall accident claim, you also have to prove all the other elements of a negligence claim. That means you have to prove that the defendant owed you a duty of care, that you suffered physical and financial damages, and that the negligence of the defendant caused those damages. In a typical car accident case, negligence can be proved with police reports and camera footage. You usually don’t have that type of evidence in slip and fall cases. In slip and fall accidents, you generally have to rely on first-hand accounts of the accident. As we mentioned above, you will also have to prove that the property owner or someone in charge at the property knew about the hazard and that they had enough time to repair it or remove it but didn’t. If you’re lucky, there were security cameras so you have video footage of your accident and the events that lead up to it. Or maybe you have a witness statements that can back up your claims. In a worst-case scenario, no one was around when your accident happened, there is no security camera footage, and there is no evidence you can use to claim that the property owner knew of the hazard. That worst-case scenario is all too common, which is why it is so hard to win slip and fall cases. Source link The post Are Slip and Fall Cases Hard To Win? | The Brown Firm first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law.
The suspensions range from three to eight years and one student received a deferred suspension, the university said in a statement. The statement didn’t name the specific students who were disciplined.
Stone Foltz, 20, died on March 4 after he was found unresponsive in his apartment. A coroner ruled his death an accident resulting from a fatal level of alcohol intoxication during a hazing incident, according to prosecutors working on a criminal case in connection with Foltz’s death.
“At the beginning of the investigation into the incidents involving the tragic death of student Stone Foltz, BGSU committed to a fair, thorough and accountable disciplinary process,” said Alex Solis, deputy chief of staff and university spokesperson. “Today, the University has concluded that process. All 21 students charged were found responsible for a total of 83 violations of the BGSU Code of Student Conduct, including hazing, harm to and endangering others and furnishing alcohol.” Solis said that the university also released a report conducted by a school working group on best practices to combat hazing and that the school will continue to “take all necessary measures to eradicate hazing.”
Eight people were charged in late April in connection with Foltz’s death, and his family filed a wrongful death lawsuit in May against the Pi Kappa Alpha International Fraternity, its Delta Beta Chapter in Bowling Green, Ohio, and several others connected to the fraternity.
CNN has reached out to Pi Kappa Alpha International Fraternity regarding the disciplinary action taken by the university. An autopsy showed that Foltz had a blood alcohol content of .35, which is more than four times the legal limit.
In April, the university permanently expelled the fraternity for hazing violations in the wake of Foltz’s death.
Following Foltz’s death, the international fraternity said it had a zero-tolerance policy toward illegal activity, including hazing, and placed the BGSU chapter on interim suspension. In April, the international fraternity revoked the BGSU chapter’s charter, expelled all its current undergraduate members and further extended its sympathies to the Foltz family. Source link The post Stone Foltz: 3 students expelled by Bowling Green State University in relation to hazing death of student first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law. A Republican advocacy group on Wednesday withdrew its request for a court order seeking the immediate release of Census Bureau records after the agency’s chief scientist warned their disclosure could push back the already delayed release of redistricting data used for drawing congressional and legislative districts. Fair Lines America Foundation withdrew its request for a preliminary injunction in a public records lawsuit against the statistical agency. Earlier this week, Census Bureau Chief Scientist John Abowd had said in a court declaration that the records’ disclosure could cause an additional delay of up to six months in the redistricting data’s release. The redistricting data is set to be made public by Aug. 16 following a five-month delay from its original deadline due to the pandemic. The delay sent states scrambling to revise redistricting deadlines, and two states, Ohio and Alabama, sued the Census Bureau in an unsuccessful effort to get it to release the data before August. Fair Lines sued the Census Bureau in a public records lawsuit for information about how the census count was conducted on people living in dormitories, prisons, nursing homes and group homes. Those facilities are called “group quarters” by the bureau. Fair Lines says it’s concerned about the accuracy of the group quarters count and wants to make sure anomalies didn’t affect the state population figures used for divvying up congressional seats among the states. The withdrawal is only being made on the preliminary injunction motion, not the public records lawsuit. Group facilities were among the most difficult places to count people during the 2020 census because the pandemic forced colleges to shutter dorms and send students home. Also, nursing homes and other facilities restricted access in an effort to protect vulnerable residents from the virus. Abowd said that if the Census Bureau is required to release additional records as part of the Fair Lines lawsuit it will need as much as six months to recalibrate a new statistical tool meant to protect people’s privacy so that they can’t be identified through the data. The privacy method known as “differential privacy” adds calibrated error to the data, most noticeably at small geographic levels such as neighborhood blocks, in order to prevent people being identified by high-powered computers through matches with third-party data such as voting records or credit card data. In a statement, Fair Lines called Abowd’s declaration “laughably self-serving.” “This Census Bureau has been plagued with embarrassing problems for the last many months, in large part due to Abowd’s push to apply ‘differential privacy’ over the objections of many outside and inside the Bureau,” the statement said. “All we are seeking is transparency in how the count was determined – which reveals no privacy issues whatsoever.” Because of the privacy method, data at the neighborhood block-level may look “fuzzy,” with weird situations such as blocks showing children living with no adults or the number of people not matching the number of housing units in a block, acting Census Bureau director Ron Jarmin said Wednesday in a blog post. Jarmin said that blocks should be added together to produce accurate results. “Though unusual, situations like these in the data help confirm that confidentiality is being protected,” Jarmin said. ___ Follow Mike Schneider on Twitter at https://twitter.com/MikeSchneiderAP rn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit-signup-optimizely/start"},{"id":"limit-signup","count":12,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":{"template":"{% extends "grid" %}rnrn{% block heading_text %}Youu2019ve read your 10 free articles for this 30 day period. Sign up now for local coverage you wonu2019t find anywhere else, special sections and your favorite columnists. StarTribune puts Minnesota and the world right at your fingertips. {% endblock %}rnrn{% block last %}rn{{ parent() }}rn{# limit Krux pixel from https://www.squishlist.com/strib/customshop/328/ #}rnrn rn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit-signup/start"},{"id":"meter-desktop-331","count":10,"action":"ignore","mute":false,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/meter-desktop-331/start"},{"id":"PDA991499opt","count":9,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/PDA991499opt/start"},{"id":"limit","count":8,"action":"inject","mute":false,"action_config":{"template":" rnrn rnrn
rn
rn
rn rn
rn t
rn SUBSCRIBErn Already a subscriber? Log in.rn
rn
All Star Tribune readers without a Digital Access subscription are given a limited number of complimentary articles every 30 days. Once the article limit is reached we ask readers to purchase a subscription including Digital Access to continue reading. Digital Access is included in all multi-day paper home delivery, Sunday + Digital, and Premium Digital Access subscriptions. After the 1 month Premium Digital Access introductory period you will be charged at a rate of $14.99 per month. You can see all subscription options or login to an existing subscription herern
rn rn rn rn rn rn rn"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/limit/start"},{"id":"nag","count":7,"action":"lightbox","mute":true,"action_config":{"height":null,"width":"630px","redirect_on_close":null,"template":"{% extends "shell" %}rnrn{% block substyles %}rn rn{% endblock %}rnrn{% block page %}rn{#rnrn{{ limit - count - 1 }}rnrn{{ form.flow_form_open({nextAction: 'firstSlide'}, null, null, '_top') }}rn {{ form.btn('Save Now') }}rn{{ form.flow_form_close() }}rnrn
rn {{ form.get_general_error_messages(['authenticate']) }}rn {{ form.flow_form_open({nextAction: 'login'}, ['authenticate'], 'login-form', '_top') }}rn
rn {{ form.login }}rn {{ form.flow_form_close() }}rn rnrn rnu2022 rnrnrnrn#}rn
rn
rn
You have {{ limit - count - 1 }} articles left rn rn rn u00a0u00a0u2022u00a0u00a0rn rn rn rn
rn
rn {{ form.get_general_error_messages(['authenticate']) }}rn {{ form.flow_form_open({nextAction: 'login'}, ['authenticate'], 'login-form', '_top') }}rn
rn {{ form.login }}rn {{ form.flow_form_close() }}rn rn rn Over 70% off!rn
rn
rn rn
rn rn 99u00a2 for first 4 weeksrn {{ form.flow_form_open({nextAction: 'firstSlide'}, null, null, '_top') }}rn {{ form.button('Save Now', 'btn nag-btn') }}rn {{ form.flow_form_close() }}rn rn rn{% endblock %}rnrn{% block last %}rn{{ parent() }}rn rn{% endblock %}"},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/nag/start"},{"id":"x","count":4,"action":"ignore","mute":true,"action_config":false,"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/x/start"},{"id":"multi-start","count":3,"action":"fly_in","mute":true,"action_config":{"location":"bottom_left","slide_direction":"bottom","group_id":null,"display_delay":"0","collapse_delay":"10","template":" rn "},"start":"https://users.startribune.com/placement/1/environment/3/multi-start/start"}]}; The post Facing Census delay, group withdraws request for records first appeared on Aggressive Injury Law. |
AuthorWe are a group of legal and allied legal professionals that enjoy publishing and curating great legal content about the law and the leagal profession. We concentrate on posting about injury law . Archives
September 2021
Categories |